Выпуск №1

Conditions for Claiming from the Recipient of Erroneously Transferred Means of Subsistence

Авторы:

A. A. Smagina

---

Информация о статье:

Тип статьи: jurisprudence

---

Для цитирования:

A. A. Smagina, ‘Conditions for claiming from the recipient of erroneously transferred means of subsistence’, Ural Journal of Legal Research, 2021, No. 1. pp. 48–51. DOI 10.34076/2658_512X_2021_1_48.

---

Аннотация:

The article discusses the issue of applying paragraph 3 of Art. 1109 of the Civil Code
of the Russian Federation, namely, is it possible to claim enrichment under one of the conditions which are specified in this legal rule - either bad faith on the part of the recipient, or a counting error, or a combination of them is needed. Based on the analysis of judicial practice, it was concluded that the text of the norm contains editorial inaccuracy and that any of the conditions specified in it is sufficient to recover the overpaid amounts.

---

Список цитируемой литературы:

1. M. M. Agarkov, D. M. Genkin (ed.), Civil Law: a Textbook, Moscow, 1944, at 353.
2. A. I. Egorova, The Theoretical Value of the Definition of the Concept of “Counting Error” for the Practical Application of Paragraph 3 of Art. 1109 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (2017) Legal Sciences: Problems and Prospects: Materials of the VI International Scientific Conf., at 38–40.
3. A. V. Mertvishchev, Recovery as Unjust Enrichment of Livelihoods (2019) Lawyer 10, at 51-58.
4. S. N. Bratus, O. N. Sadikov (ed.), Commentary on the Civil Code of the RSFSR, Moscow, Legal Literature, 1982.
5. N. G. Solomina, Obligation from Unjust Enrichment: Concept, Types, Mechanism of Compensation, Moscow, Yustitsinform, 2009, at 69.
6. S. I. Bogdanov, V. B. Evtyukhin, Y. P. Knyazev and others, Morphology of the Modern Russian Language: a Textbook, St. Petersburg, 2009.

---

Ключевые слова:

unjust enrichment; means of subsistence, dishonesty, calculation error

---

Полный текст статьи