Уральский журнал правовых исследований

Выпуск №4

УДК:342.565.2
DOI: 10.34076/2658_512X_2021_4_10
Год: 2021, Номер: 4, Страницы 10-18
Лицензия Creative Commons
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial» .

Liquidation of Сonstitutional (Statutory) Courts of Subjects: Problems and Prospects

Авторы:

Maxim Yu. Burdukov, Anastasia D. Makarenko


Информация о статье:

Тип статьи: Юриспруденция


Для цитирования:

Maxim Yu. Burdukov, Anastasia D. Makarenko ‘Liquidation of constitutional (statutory) courts of subjects: problems and prospects’, Ural Journal of Legal Research, 2021, No. 4. pp.10-18. DOI 10.34076/2658_512X_2021_4_10


Аннотация:

In this study, the author uses a comparative method to distinguish between the trust institute and the fiduciary management agreement (Chapter 53 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation). The purpose of the work is connected to the identification and confusion of the examined institutions, sometimes found in the doctrine. Moreover, the problem is complicated because of different doctrinal ideas about the essence of the trust, as well as its specific features. Considering the essential characteristics, as well as a number of criteria, related to the form of these legal structures, conclusions about the impossibility of mixing these institutions are made. Meanwhile, the issues of the subject matter, as well as responsibility to beneficiaries, studied by the author, are worthy of attention within the framework of the differentiation of trust property and trust management, from a practical point of view. Aspects related to the choice of the applicable law to the trust relationship play a special role in the issue of separating the trust institute from the fiduciary management agreement, and in particular their correct qualification. Based on international legal sources and an assessment of doctrinal positions, the author points out the need to apply the «law of the closest connection» to the regulation of the trust. Moreover, an integral component of the work is the consideration of the most notable court cases, which became a foundation for the formation of certain legal positions in the future, as well the analysis of current foreign legislation, in particular, the rules on the trust of the offshore jurisdictions is especially considered. In turn, with the help of this method, the specific features of trust relations are revealed, and this determines the slightly different legal regulation of the institution of trust property abroad.


Список цитируемой литературы:

1. Gataullin A. G., Hurmatullina A. M. On the Issue of Changing the Status of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in Connection with the Amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation that Came into Force on March 14, 2020, Bulletin of Economics, Law and Sociology, 2020, no. 4, pp. 97-100.

2. Evloev I. M. Liquidation of the Constitutional (Charter) Courts of the Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation: A Pattern or Error? Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2020. Vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 141-150

3. Avakyan S. A. Some problems of improving constitutional justice in the Russian Federation, Constitutional justice in the CIS and Baltic States: digest of official materials and publications of the periodical press, 2006, no. 3, pp. 131-135.

4. Zherebcova E. E., Zlishcheva L. A. About the need of activating of formation process of the constitutional (authorized) justice in subjects of the Russian Federation, Society and law, 2015, no. 1, pp. 40-44.

5. Kryazhkov V. A. Regional constitutional justice in the Russian Federation: state of affairs and ways of development. Comparative constitutional review, 2007, no. 3, pp. 156-162.

6. Shulzhenko Yu. L. Institute of Constitutional Supervision in the Russian Federation, Moscow, IGPAN, 1998, 112 p.

7. Avakyan S. A. Constitutional lexicon: Dictionary of constitutional legal terms, Moscow, Yusticinform, 2015, 640 p.

8. Vanberg G. The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. 193 p.

9. Craig P. Constitutional and Non-constitutional Review // Current Legal Problems. 2001. Vol. 54. Iss. 1. P. 147-178. DOI: 10.1093/clp/54.1.147.

10. Mc.Whinney E. Supreme Courts and Judicial Law-making: Constitutional Tribunals and Constitutional Review. Boston: Dordrecht, 1986. 305 p.


Ключевые слова:

constitutional (charter) courts, constitutional control, constitutional supervision, constitutional court of Russian Federation, constitution (charter) of the subject of the Russian Federation, constitutional legal proceedings


Полный текст статьи